I’ve always
been fascinated by time. Not in the way
of watches or clocks, but in the way “six degrees of separation” links us
to the past and, indeed, to the future.
The idea of stepping back in time is compelling – and for my work as a
writer of historical fiction, that’s exactly what I have to do. I’m helped by
memory, of course, and by the fact that, when I was a child, I loved to listen to elderly people telling me their stories.
Let me tell
you what has brought on this reflection.
Fifty years ago this week, Sir Winston Churchill died at his home in
London. At the time, I was nine years
old, in Mr. Croft’s class at school, and having terrible trouble with fractions. I was
never going to be a mathematician, but I had been near top of my class until we
got to the dreaded fractions. I would
come home and weep because anything less than whole numbers seemed beyond my
ken.
In America,
more people tuned in to watch Churchill’s funeral than that of President
Kennedy. It is probably true that
Churchill – whose mother, Jennie, was an American – is probably held in higher
esteem in certain circles in the USA than in the UK. In one of my novels, set in the early 1930’s,
Churchill is described as being on the hinterland of power, a man pushed aside due
to his less than stellar performance in the Great War – his errors had mounted
up, and his political track record in the 1920’s left something to be desired. I received a few letters from Americans
asking how I could possibly say such a thing about this giant of the 20th
century. But as I explained – I cannot
get away from the facts of the matter. Every dog has its day, and Winston
Churchill’s was not in the early 1930’s.
Nancy Astor said at the time, “Churchill is finished.” His true day came much later, in the Second
World War.
So, we
become travelers in time and place with every passing day. The global becomes personal when we hear,
read, or watch the news. We remember
where we were when this happened or when we watched events unfold that became history,
and we remember the talk around us, the way people took the news. With our memories and the recollections of
others we can finger the fibers of the past.
We can tease out and recall the images that resonate, and they become
part of our personal and collective mythology.
It’s the same with the future – everything we do today has bearing upon
tomorrow. Some of us play with fate in a small way (OK, so I confess, I just
had a hot bath, and yet I am still using collected rain from the last storm to
water my garden, in this very drought stricken California), and some of us
involve ourselves more deeply – scientific research, political activism,
environmental advocacy, for example. Or we
write fiction – which can predict the future in a scarily accurate way, in the
same manner that universal truths can be revealed in a well-told story.
As writers
we play with time, with character and place. The memories big and small have a
bearing on what and how we write. But
you don’t have to be a writer to be a time traveler – you just have to
remember, to be curious (like Patty with her research into her family history),
and to listen to people, old and young.
If you do that, you can look both ways at once – rather like being on a
road, and seeing what has gone before, and what is still to come. And there’s something very meaningful about
that – a way of connecting oneself to the big picture, while smiling at the small
snapshot that puts you in a certain place and a certain time. I look at photos of Churchill’s funeral, and though
I was not one of those lining the route, and I was born long after his finest hour – I was there, in my way.
Ooops, the tube's gone again ...
Thanks for sharing this bit of history. I've been intrigued of degrees of time separation since I met a friend of a friend. My friend Jean is a member of the church in where Lucy Maud Montgomery's husband was minister from 1926-1942. Jean's friend, a lifelong parishoner there, told us that as a child, she liked the minister a lot, but wasn't so keen on LMM.
ReplyDeleteI came away with the a feeling of awe that I was only one degree away from L M Montgomery. And then, having recently read her journals, I remembered that LMM's grandfather, a senator, had been friends with Sir John A Macdonald, the man who brought about Canada's confederation in 1867 and was the first Prime Minister. LMM had, as a child, met him and travelled with him and her grandfather on Sir John A's private railway car.
Oh gosh! Only two degrees away from that great historical figure.
The Time Travel possibilities are endless.
from Jacqueline: Lovely to hear your story, Susan. It's when we "time travel" in this way, and make the connections, that there is - perhaps - more of a mutual regard for others, regardless of color, creed, cultural background, age, gender, economic situation. We all have a time machine ...
DeleteOnce again I'm amazed and awed by your "voice" and the beauty of your words. Seriously, Our J. Kudos. No wonder you're a superstar.
ReplyDeletexoxopatty
from Jacqueline: Not sure about "superstar" Patty - but thank you for your comment here on our little ol' blog! I just start rambling and away I go ...
ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing you for sharing your memory of Winston Churchill. I read about Churchill over the years and I watched a movie about WC with Hardy as the actor. Despite that, I had a different perspective after seeing the exhibit about Winston Churchill at Blenheim Palace. I learned more about him from my visit to Blenheim Palace in 1990.
ReplyDeleteOf the 3 leaders (Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin), Churchill outlived the others. Was it Churchill who started the National Health service after the war or was it his party?
Diana
from Jacqueline: Thanks for your comment, Diana. No, Churchill was far from being the PM who ushered in the NHS. Churchill was rather a snob, and did not believe there was such a thing as the "women's vote" - but it was that very vote that brought Clement Attlee to power, and he brought in the NHS and the social reforms that Britain enjoys today. Churchill soon got the message though, courted the women's vote, and came to power again a few years later. But we have much to thank Clement Attlee for.
Deletewhat patty said!
ReplyDeleteyou're a great rambler, jackie. always have been.....
and don't you ever stop, you hear!
sybille
from Jacqueline: As always, lovely to hear from you, Sybille!! And I'll keep on rambling ....
DeleteThis is great, Jackie. As you know, I'm a great history buff. Our heroes aren't always nice people, but usually they are the ones we need at a certain time.
ReplyDeletefrom Jacqueline: Very well said, Jim.
ReplyDeleteWhat a figure of towering strength and determination, just when England needed him!
ReplyDelete