A cop, a Brit, a deb, a B-school grad, a guy with good hair, and a wisecracking lawyer wrestle with the naked truth about literature and life.
Tuesday, January 07, 2014
Top Legal Thrillers: I Need Help!
From the messy desk of Paul Levine...
I'm putting together a list of my favorite legal thrillers, so feel free to chime in.
Coincidentally, I've come across a website called "Online Universities" that has selected its own favorites and summarizes each one in a single sentence. Here's the one-line summary of Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird," which comes in first.
"To Kill a Mockingbird" explores the implications of the cases you take on."
Yep, that's it. No mention of race, or justice, or parenting, or intolerance (and later, tolerance). Who in the name of Boo Radley wrote such a lousy description? Was the writing assignment out-sourced to Mars?
I have no problem with the choice of the novel, even though far more people remember the movie than the underlying book.
And of course, "Mockingbird" is much more than a "legal thriller." but the rape trial is surely a major element of the story. But get this...here's the one-line summary of the classic novel:
But back to the topic. Do you have any favorite legal thrillers? I am building my list.
Other, than "Mockingbird," here are some early candidates:
"Anatomy of a Murder" by Robert Traver (That's the pen name of a former Michigan Supreme Court justice, and we were pen pals, but that's a story for another day).
"Presumed Innocent" by Scott Turow
"A Time to Kill" by John Grisham
"The Best of Rumpole" by John Mortimer (or other Rumpole stories)
"The Case of the Careless Kitten" by Erle Stanley Gardner (or other Perry Mason stories)
"The Witness for the Prosecution" by Agatha Christie (a short story and stage play, not nearly as well known as the Tyrone Power/Charles Laughton/Marlene Dietrich movie).
"The Bonfire of the Vanities" by Tom Wolfe (using an expansive definition of legal thriller).
"The Lincoln Lawyer" by Michael Connelly
"Defending Jacob" by William Landay
"QB VII" by Leon Uris
"Primal Fear" by William Diehl
"Gone, but Not Forgotten" by Phillip Margolin
"The Seven Minutes" by Irving Wallace
What say you?
Paul Levine
Monday, January 06, 2014
Love Letters From the War
Patty here…
On December 29, 2013, the Los Angeles Times featured an op-ed piece by Simon Garfield titled: “A Love Letter to the Love Letter,” in which the author extolled letter writing with pen and paper over texts, tweets, Facebook postings and other quick-and-dirty communications preferred these days.
When I was young, my mother encouraged me (okay, forced me) to write thank-you letters for gifts I’d received. When I got older and moved away from home, she and I regularly exchanged letters. I have kept many of her letters, which convey newsy information written in her careful handwriting.
Letter writing is a lovely idea. Years ago, a friend and I decided to resurrect the personal letter by limiting our communication exclusively to handwritten snail-mail. We didn’t get very far with that and I’ve since lost touch with her. I haven’t ditched the personal letter idea entirely. The hostess of a dinner party I’ve attended still receives a handwritten thank you note from me, but most of my correspondence has drifted into the electronic category.
When my mother died, she left a box of letters written to her by my dad when he was in the Army during WWII. They were newlyweds, so I suppose you could classify them as love letters. I can’t say because I have never read them. To do so seems like an invasion of her privacy.
Many of the letters are stamped with “Passed by U.S. Army Examiner,” and include a number of the examiner who cleared them for mailing. Some letters are V-mail (short for Victory Mail, a concept we borrowed from the Brits), carried in small brown envelopes (4.75” x 3.75”) that sport this return address:
WAR & NAVY DEPARTMENT
V--Mail Services
__________
official business
Also included in the box with the letters is a War Department booklet dated August 1945 titled GOING BACK TO CIVILIAN LIFE, a rosary, a Childs Prayerbook: Instructions and Prayers for Catholic Children and a small spiral notebook in my dad's handwriting that he must have carried with him. It includes a list of items in his dufflebag and other cryptic notes I find intriguing.
I always knew the letters were in my mother's possession. She occasionally talked about them and once told me that censors had redacted parts of some correspondence when my dad had inadvertently revealed too much information about where he was at the time. When my dad died, she talked about burning the letters, but she never did, nor did she instruct me to do so for her.
The letters are part of history, but what place should they hold? I feel as if I’m caught in a Bridges of Madison County moment. What should I do with them? Shred? Read?
No handwritten responses required.
HAPPY MONDAY!
On December 29, 2013, the Los Angeles Times featured an op-ed piece by Simon Garfield titled: “A Love Letter to the Love Letter,” in which the author extolled letter writing with pen and paper over texts, tweets, Facebook postings and other quick-and-dirty communications preferred these days.
When I was young, my mother encouraged me (okay, forced me) to write thank-you letters for gifts I’d received. When I got older and moved away from home, she and I regularly exchanged letters. I have kept many of her letters, which convey newsy information written in her careful handwriting.
Letter writing is a lovely idea. Years ago, a friend and I decided to resurrect the personal letter by limiting our communication exclusively to handwritten snail-mail. We didn’t get very far with that and I’ve since lost touch with her. I haven’t ditched the personal letter idea entirely. The hostess of a dinner party I’ve attended still receives a handwritten thank you note from me, but most of my correspondence has drifted into the electronic category.
When my mother died, she left a box of letters written to her by my dad when he was in the Army during WWII. They were newlyweds, so I suppose you could classify them as love letters. I can’t say because I have never read them. To do so seems like an invasion of her privacy.
Many of the letters are stamped with “Passed by U.S. Army Examiner,” and include a number of the examiner who cleared them for mailing. Some letters are V-mail (short for Victory Mail, a concept we borrowed from the Brits), carried in small brown envelopes (4.75” x 3.75”) that sport this return address:
WAR & NAVY DEPARTMENT
V--Mail Services
__________
official business
Also included in the box with the letters is a War Department booklet dated August 1945 titled GOING BACK TO CIVILIAN LIFE, a rosary, a Childs Prayerbook: Instructions and Prayers for Catholic Children and a small spiral notebook in my dad's handwriting that he must have carried with him. It includes a list of items in his dufflebag and other cryptic notes I find intriguing.
I always knew the letters were in my mother's possession. She occasionally talked about them and once told me that censors had redacted parts of some correspondence when my dad had inadvertently revealed too much information about where he was at the time. When my dad died, she talked about burning the letters, but she never did, nor did she instruct me to do so for her.
The letters are part of history, but what place should they hold? I feel as if I’m caught in a Bridges of Madison County moment. What should I do with them? Shred? Read?
No handwritten responses required.
HAPPY MONDAY!
Friday, January 03, 2014
(Quite) A Few Words About Book Reviews
from Jacqueline
The issue of reviews came to mind while I was listening to
reviewer Oline Cogdill being interviewed on the subject of the TV series Downton Abbey, and which books viewers
might choose if they wanted to delve deeper into the period represented in the
series. The Great War was covered, so
along with several other authors, my books were mentioned. I wasn’t going to listen to the interview at
first – I try to keep away from reviews of my books - but I became taken with what, for me, was the
most interesting part of the interview, which was the integrity of the reviewer
when asked about her process. Her
responses shone with a professionalism, which of course you would expect from someone
who has honed her craft over a good number of years and with many publications,
online and paper. You don’t always find such
integrity among (for example) the comments posted on online retailer websites. Frankly, I sometimes wonder whether some of
the readers commenting on those sites really want to say something about the
book in question, or whether they are on a quest to be as sarcastic as they can
be so that they might come across as overflowing with wit. Of course, there are
many very good reviewers, amateur and professional, who want only to share
their thoughts about books they’ve read – which is great and a good way for
others to get an idea of whether a book is one they’d like to invest in. Then of course, there are the people who give
a poor review or comment because the packaging was inadequate – but that’s another
story. I should add that I do not read
Amazon or any other online reviews of my books.
In fact, I try to stay well away, as I mentioned earlier. I came to that decision soon after my first
book was published. I made the mistake
of reading an Amazon “review” by a snarky individual and it really upset me. I
lost sleep over it. Authors don’t cease
to be human with all the frailties of the condition on publication day.
Just to get 2014 off to a bit of a blast here at Naked Authors, I’m going to launch into the thorny area of reviews.
Thorny, because writers often like to steer
away from this subject, mainly, I suppose, so as not to inadvertently upset reviewers,
or let them think they’ve affected the writer in any way.
They also don’t want to be dissed all over
the internet – I keep thinking of that scene in The West Wing, where Josh responded to an internet comment about
him (against Donna’s advice, I might add – remember that one, West Wing fans?),
and subsequently unleashed the full power of social media against him.
I believe that anyone who decides to embark upon a writing project
– be it a novel, an essay, short story, children’s book, etc - needs a good old
pat on the back. Well done – this world
needs your creative energy. Unless of course you’re writing a guide to blowing
up buildings, then skip that last comment.
Seriously, it takes time, commitment, faith, and so many other
attributes to write a book, so I take my hat off to anyone – and I mean anyone
– who tries and succeeds. To be sure, we
can’t all be considered up there with the greats of literature. All we can do is produce our work to the best
of our ability and then, if our sense of self hasn’t been completely zapped by
the humbling nature of the process, we put it out there into the publishing
universe. Maybe that book/essay/short
story does well. Maybe it doesn’t. But
if you’ve made it that far, well good for you!
You’ll never be an, “If only I’d….” kind of person – and there’s a lot
to be said for that.
Ok, so maybe some readers don’t like your work – it’s going
to happen, make no mistake. You can’t
please everyone, because we all have different tastes. But here’s what amazes me – the manner in
which some so-called reviewers communicate their disregard for an author. Constructive criticism is one thing, but some
of the reviews I’ve come across are just beyond the pale (to write this piece, I
went to online reviews of a few of my favorite books published in 2013). When I looked at some of the bad reviews, I
wondered if the reader-reviewers really wanted to be that unkind? Did they think they were showing intellectual
heft when decimating a book? Heck, if it makes you that grumpy, do what I do – if I don’t like a book, I put
the thing down and look for something else to read. Donate the unwanted book to a library –
someone will read it and enjoy it, even if you don’t. Find something you would much rather read and
try to be positive – it’ll make you feel better about yourself, which will
inspire much better juju all around.
After all, what we say about something and how we voice our opinion
reflects who we are in the world more than, say, the book we’ve just read.
If you’re willing to step up to the plate and learn to
assess a book (essay, short story, etc.) with the integrity of a well-regarded professional
reviewer, and develop your review with that sort of mindset - then your reviews
will find a broader audience, and might just be read by the writers, who will
be pleased to have the feedback, the constructive criticism along with an
indication of what’s working and what isn’t.
And maybe the review might inspire a writer do something next time that
makes all the difference to their work – and to their career. A reviewer who can do that is worth their
weight in gold – because as well as bringing a book to the attention of
readers, they also become teachers for all of us. I once heard Elizabeth George give the
following advice (paraphrased here), “Read above yourself.” That’s good advice – keep your sights
high in terms of your reading matter.
And if you’re a writer, that goes for reviews too – if you have to read
reviews of your work, then take note of who’s doing the reviewing. A good reviewer stands out and is going to
help you. Credentials don’t necessarily
make a good reviewer – I’ve seen drivel from the pens of Ph.D’s – but a lack of
ego certainly helps, someone who can get out of their own way, bringing to the
table a finely honed sense of what makes a given book a satisfying reading experience, while adding, perhaps, an encouraging word or two on what might have made it even better.
Finally, I remember listening to an actress being
interviewed on the radio – I can’t remember who it was - she had been asked
about reviews of her recent performance in a movie. “I realized a long time ago,” she said, “that
if I believed all the good reviews, I had to believe all the bad reviews. Now I don’t read any reviews. I just do my
best, always.”
That’s the mantra for me.
It’s all you can do as a writer, really – weave your words on the page
and create the very best story you can. And never do a Josh from The West Wing!
Happy New Year, everyone!
And what’s on your TBR list this year?
Monday, December 30, 2013
The Secret Life of You-Know-Who
Patty here…
Last Saturday night, I saw The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, a film based on the short story by James Thurber. The movie was nothing like Thurber's short fiction I remember reading many years ago. I wondered if my recall powers might be hazy, so the following morning I searched my bookcase for The Thurber Carnival, First Modern Library Edition 1957, and reread the story. As it turns out, “very loosely based” might be a better description.
Thurber writes an amusing tale, first published in The New Yorker on March 18, 1939, featuring a somewhat befuddled and henpecked husband who daydreams about heroic adventures while his wife complains about his driving and lectures him about the need to wear overshoes. If you don't remember the story, you might remember the churning machines of his fantasies: “ta-pocketa-pocketa-pocketa-pocketa.”
The 2013 Ben Stiller version is a romantic comedy that made me laugh loud and often. Several running gags paid off in hilarious and satisfying ways. The cinematography was exquisite and the credits, both before and after the film, were fresh and creative. Kristen Wiig is always wonderfully watchable. Sean Penn’s cameo as the rugged and elusive photographer is perfect. Ben Stiller's priceless scene in the bar in Iceland is a nod to Mitty’s fantasies in the Thurber story.
In Stiller's film, Walter Mitty is a negative asset manager for Life Magazine. i.e., the caretaker of photo negatives from iconic photographs that have graced the covers of the magazine, a job he has held for sixteen years. He isn’t exactly living a life of quiet desperation. He’s a daydreamer but he's good at his job. He has close relationships with his mother, sister and at least one coworker. The inciting incident forces Walter to choose between fantasy and reality.
Because we're nearing the eve of a new year, often a time of reflection, I began to consider Walter’s dilemma and wondered: Am I harboring dreams I’ve never acted on, like climbing Mt. Everest, sailing to Australia on a tramp steamer. joining the circus or dancing the samba dressed as an archangel in the Carnaval parade in Rio de Janeiro?
Okay, so cross that one off the list. I’ve had many interesting experiences in my life but this film had me revisiting my bucket list. What about you? Is there anything you’ve always wanted to do but haven’t done yet? Is 2014 the year?
HAPPY MONDAY AND A HEALTHY, HAPPY 2014!
Last Saturday night, I saw The Secret Life of Walter Mitty, a film based on the short story by James Thurber. The movie was nothing like Thurber's short fiction I remember reading many years ago. I wondered if my recall powers might be hazy, so the following morning I searched my bookcase for The Thurber Carnival, First Modern Library Edition 1957, and reread the story. As it turns out, “very loosely based” might be a better description.
Thurber writes an amusing tale, first published in The New Yorker on March 18, 1939, featuring a somewhat befuddled and henpecked husband who daydreams about heroic adventures while his wife complains about his driving and lectures him about the need to wear overshoes. If you don't remember the story, you might remember the churning machines of his fantasies: “ta-pocketa-pocketa-pocketa-pocketa.”
The 2013 Ben Stiller version is a romantic comedy that made me laugh loud and often. Several running gags paid off in hilarious and satisfying ways. The cinematography was exquisite and the credits, both before and after the film, were fresh and creative. Kristen Wiig is always wonderfully watchable. Sean Penn’s cameo as the rugged and elusive photographer is perfect. Ben Stiller's priceless scene in the bar in Iceland is a nod to Mitty’s fantasies in the Thurber story.
In Stiller's film, Walter Mitty is a negative asset manager for Life Magazine. i.e., the caretaker of photo negatives from iconic photographs that have graced the covers of the magazine, a job he has held for sixteen years. He isn’t exactly living a life of quiet desperation. He’s a daydreamer but he's good at his job. He has close relationships with his mother, sister and at least one coworker. The inciting incident forces Walter to choose between fantasy and reality.
Because we're nearing the eve of a new year, often a time of reflection, I began to consider Walter’s dilemma and wondered: Am I harboring dreams I’ve never acted on, like climbing Mt. Everest, sailing to Australia on a tramp steamer. joining the circus or dancing the samba dressed as an archangel in the Carnaval parade in Rio de Janeiro?
Okay, so cross that one off the list. I’ve had many interesting experiences in my life but this film had me revisiting my bucket list. What about you? Is there anything you’ve always wanted to do but haven’t done yet? Is 2014 the year?
HAPPY MONDAY AND A HEALTHY, HAPPY 2014!
Friday, December 27, 2013
Boxing Day Tales
from Jacqueline
I remember, at my first job after coming to live in America,
I claimed Boxing Day as a cultural holiday – which of course we were allowed to
do at the company where I worked, so I milked that one for what it was worth. Indeed the
best thing about Christmas is Boxing Day, in my estimation.
Then along came the Christians, who were pretty savvy
marketers. They had it down long before,
say, Pottery Barn, that if you want to be successful, you set up shop in the
same location as the other successful shops.
So the Christians saw these people who they wanted to convert and rather
than trying to draw them to another location, well, they just built their
churches right next to the yew tree where everyone met to worship the natural
world. And they decided to move their
celebrations too – so Christmas became late December. Easter – my most favorite holy day – took the
place of festivals to welcome the sun coming back again and the crops beginning to break through, with the egg representing new life. The "new life" story sat well alongside the story of the Resurrection, so it was again co-opted to bring a few more converts on board. Think of these things when you dispose of your evergreen tree, or when you go shopping for one of these in a few months time.
And if you go to any ancient church in Britain today, you will see a yew tree right next to it – they live for thousands of years, and worshippers were on the spot long before the first stone was laid to build a church.
I remember it as the day when all the family descended upon
us. We might have had a few family
members for Christmas Day, but on Boxing Day there was an onslaught of relatives – and games aplenty, descending into contact sports only when one of the
cousins tried to commandeer a toy everyone else wanted to play with, then it
should have been renamed “Mayhem, Blood and Tears Day.” Or, given the number sitting down at the dining
table (in the case of the kids, at my father’s wallpapering trestles draped with sheets and spread out in the living room), it
could have been, “You won’t get your dinner on a plate because we've run out of china day, but the biscuit tin
lid will have to do."
There were two highlights of the day for me. The first was early, before the relatives came rattling
down our bumpy road, at least two families to a car, with kids waving out the
windows and parents tired already after the long drive from London. I would walk up the lane to stand outside the Duke of Kent pub in
our little hamlet, where the Boxing Day hunt gathered for a stirrup cup before
taking off across frost-dusted fields in pursuit of the fox. Generally, foxes are way too canny to be
caught. I don’t like fox-hunting, and I
subscribe to the maxim that the hunt represents the unspeakable in pursuit of
the inedible – but I do love to see the Hunt in full color, strange as that
might seem.
Especially if you’ve already had Christmas pudding ….
I don’t know why we had Tunis Cake on Boxing Day, but I
loved it. A Tunis Cake is basically a
plain Madeira Cake – a bit like the American pound cake – covered in a thick
layer of chocolate and decorated with small oranges, pears and apples made from
marzipan. I love marzipan. I love it more than the cake part of Christmas cake
(a rich fruit cake – remember the dried fruits brought out for the feast of
Saturnalia? Well, the ritual lingers in Yuletide cakes and puddings.
A longish essay, just to give you fair warning – but look at
it this way, reading will help burn off those holiday calories.
At time of writing, it is early on Boxing Day. If you’re pretty much anywhere in what is known as the
“Commonwealth” – former territories of the old British Empire – you will be celebrating Boxing Day, unless of course you're in Australasia, where of course it was yesterday, as opposed to tomorrow, when this post will be published (which for readers is today ...). I tell you, that Old Father Time has the last laugh doesn't he? Give it another few days and he'll be waving his scythe again while we get to grips with resolutions and goals, and a swaddled 2014 wriggles in the old boy's arms.
Boxing Day is probably one of the most sensible holidays of the year – indeed, I've never quite become used to the fact that, in America, once Christmas Day is over, that’s it, Christmas is done. What happened to the twelve days of Christmas? Don’t you know that taking down your tree before January 6th is unlucky? Mind you, Americans tend to put up their Christmas trees really rather early.
Boxing Day is probably one of the most sensible holidays of the year – indeed, I've never quite become used to the fact that, in America, once Christmas Day is over, that’s it, Christmas is done. What happened to the twelve days of Christmas? Don’t you know that taking down your tree before January 6th is unlucky? Mind you, Americans tend to put up their Christmas trees really rather early.
People here often ask me about Boxing Day – what is it? What does it mean? Well, there are several “meanings” attached
to it, but I can tell you right now, if someone tells you it’s the day when all
the boxes the gifts came in are disposed of – they’re wrong. It goes back to
days of yore – indeed, beyond yore! Here
are two explanations, and most people adhere to the second.
Apparently, it’s been pretty much agreed by scientists (with
particular evidence offered by astronomers who know when big stars have been
along to grab the attention of everyone from shepherds to kings), that Jesus
was born in the month we now call September.
There was no Christmas in December.
However, throughout much of northern Europe, there was a great
celebration known as Saturnalia. People
came together to light fires which they believed would strengthen the sun – it
was the time of year when the sun was winter-low in the sky and only visible
for a few hours each day. They
worshipped the evergreen because it remained fresh all year and never lost its
leaves, a sign of everlasting life. In Britain the most revered of evergreens
was the yew tree, and it was under a yew tree that those people – who were
called “pagan” by early Christians – worshipped. The feast of Saturnalia was a big event –
people brought out the dried and stored fruits of summer past to feast upon, along
with roasted pig and wild turkey, that sort of thing – and it was the foods
stored since summer that reminded them of the abundance of the passing year as
they petitioned for a good harvest in the year ahead.
The second day of the feast of Saturnalia was a day of sports and
dancing, including contact sports (such as boxing?). It was a day of relief after all that serious
stuff about the sun coming up again.
And if you go to any ancient church in Britain today, you will see a yew tree right next to it – they live for thousands of years, and worshippers were on the spot long before the first stone was laid to build a church.
Apart from Boxing Day being the day of contact sports and
much joyous partying after lighting all those fires, there is also another
meaning attached to Boxing Day. Even when I was a
kid, people referred to a seasonal gift as a “Christmas Box” – especially when
that gift was a monetary offering given to another who performed a service
throughout the year. You gave a
“Christmas Box” to the milkman, the postman, the coalman, to the paper boy, the
chimney sweep – they all had their Christmas Box, perhaps a few pennies, or
shillings pressed into a hand bearing the lines and wear of hard toil. And it was on the day after Christmas that the
lord of the manor visited his villagers, to give them a little something – a
gift of coin, or food, but nothing from Harrods, though any monetary gift was in time for ye
old new year sales! It was also a day
when alms boxes in the church were opened and the contents distributed to the
poor and needy. Thus, it became known as
Boxing Day, but with a tipping of the hat to that day of old, when people made
merry under the old yew tree, after pleading for a bit more sun.
Many of the ladies rode
side-saddle, and I loved watching them in their elegant black skirts (known as
“aprons”) and their little bowler hats with a veil drawn down. I wasn’t born in the dark ages by any means,
but this was the country, and those old habits – literally – died hard.
The second highlight
of the day, for me, was Boxing Day tea, when my mother set the Tunis Cake on
the table, along with rich fruit Christmas Cake. I defy anyone to actually eat Christmas cake
on Christmas Day.
Boxing Day was the really fun
part of Christmas – there was something lighter about it. You didn’t get
gifts, but it was a whole lot of fun. Which is why I still celebrate Boxing Day, and needless to
say, for me it includes time spent with my horses ...
... and later, in the evening, maybe a glass or two of champagne in front of the
fire to settle the season. Soon enough
the days will be long and the sun high in the sky once more.
Wishing you all a peaceful, prosperous and very happy new year. May 2014 bless you in more ways than you can imagine.
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Be Grateful! It's Good for You
From the messy desk of Paul Levine...
Well, it's Christmas Eve...unless you're in Australia where it's already next Friday.
Here's a health tip for the New Year.
Expressing gratitude to others is good for YOU. In other words, there is a perfectly good, selfish reason to be grateful to others. This makes me more grateful, just thinking about it.
All this heavy thinking comes from "Gratitude Works! A 21-Day Program for Creating Emotional Prosperity" by Robert Emmons.
Well, it's Christmas Eve...unless you're in Australia where it's already next Friday.
Here's a health tip for the New Year.
Expressing gratitude to others is good for YOU. In other words, there is a perfectly good, selfish reason to be grateful to others. This makes me more grateful, just thinking about it.
All this heavy thinking comes from "Gratitude Works! A 21-Day Program for Creating Emotional Prosperity" by Robert Emmons.
Let me be the first to say that I'm not wild about self-help books in general or phrases like "emotional prosperity" in particular. But this sounds good. You can buy the book or read an excellent summary in The Miami Herald today.
Here are the high points about gratitude:
1. It's a mood booster.
2. It's a relationship-strengthener.
3. It enables you to bounce back from setbacks.
4. It's good for your grades.
5. It's a depression fighter.
6. It helps you achieve your goals.
7. It elevates your social standing.
8. It cures the common cold.
Okay, I made the last one up. But the others sound just about right. So, in this holiday season, I'm grateful for my family and friends and everybody reading this little post.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
Monday, December 23, 2013
Christmas gifts for my fellow Nakeds
Patty here…
A couple of weeks ago I posted about my decision to forgo giving Christmas gifts but I’ve made a few exceptions. Since I’m on a knitting jag, I've picked out a few projects to make for my fellow Nakeds.
For Our J, so she never gets homesick.
And a little something for that well-dressed equine Oliver.
A sweater to keep Paulie warm at football games.
Oh, oh! And this
It’s a shame to cover up James O's magnificent hair, but I’m sure he’ll be swayed by this little beauty!
And here's something else he needs
As we all know, Ridley writes anywhere and everywhere. This will filter out distractions and protect his plot twists from the prying eyes of strangers.
For the world-traveling Cornelia so she can always find her way home
And a spare tiara for her next debutant ball
And to all our loyal readers, hoping you get lots of these
Happy Monday! Have yourself a Merry little Christmas.
A couple of weeks ago I posted about my decision to forgo giving Christmas gifts but I’ve made a few exceptions. Since I’m on a knitting jag, I've picked out a few projects to make for my fellow Nakeds.
For Our J, so she never gets homesick.
![]() |
| Link |
And a little something for that well-dressed equine Oliver.
![]() |
| Link |
A sweater to keep Paulie warm at football games.
| Link |
Oh, oh! And this
![]() |
| Link |
It’s a shame to cover up James O's magnificent hair, but I’m sure he’ll be swayed by this little beauty!
![]() |
| Link |
And here's something else he needs
![]() |
| Link |
As we all know, Ridley writes anywhere and everywhere. This will filter out distractions and protect his plot twists from the prying eyes of strangers.
![]() |
| Link |
For the world-traveling Cornelia so she can always find her way home
![]() |
| Link |
And a spare tiara for her next debutant ball
![]() |
| Link |
And to all our loyal readers, hoping you get lots of these
![]() |
| Link |
Happy Monday! Have yourself a Merry little Christmas.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











































